Re: kstackusage() patch request for comments
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 04:38:12 +0100
Alexander Motin <mav@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
The main question I have is about source files and headers I should
use for this specific purposes. Is it correct way to define function
in machine independent header, but implement it in machdep.c? Or I
should define it in machine dependent headers?
If you intend to implement the same functions on all platforms, the
prototypes should be in a machine-independent header.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- kstackusage() patch request for comments
- From: Alexander Motin
- kstackusage() patch request for comments
- Prev by Date: Re: 'periodic daily' memory usage
- Next by Date: Re: 'periodic daily' memory usage
- Previous by thread: kstackusage() patch request for comments
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|