Re: Modular type GENERIC?
- From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:56:28 +0900
On 26/02/2008, David O'Brien <obrien@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As you've shown the magic is in the loader.conf. I don't know a good way
to handle this other than attempt to load every module (like Microsoft NT
installer does) - and hope the probe of a driver that doesn't claim a
device doesn't leave that device in a bad state.
Have you tried putting every module in /boot/kernel into loader.conf in a
"load" statement?
I'm going to try doing that tonight.
Adrian
--
Adrian Chadd - adrian@xxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Modular type GENERIC?
- From: David O'Brien
- Re: Modular type GENERIC?
- References:
- Modular type GENERIC?
- From: Adrian Chadd
- Re: Modular type GENERIC?
- From: David O'Brien
- Modular type GENERIC?
- Prev by Date: Re: emulate an end-of-media
- Next by Date: Re: emulate an end-of-media
- Previous by thread: Re: Modular type GENERIC?
- Next by thread: Re: Modular type GENERIC?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|