Re: emulate an end-of-media
- From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:50:48 +0100
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:00:00PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:28:53 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:44:48PM +0100, Martin Laabs wrote:
I also made a comparison between gzip and bzip2 regardingThat's not a realistic test case. bzip2 normally takes trice the time
the compression ratio on a dump of my home directory (3.2GB)
bzip2 took about 74min to compress, gzip only 11minutes. And
in terms of compression ratio bzip2 was only 3% better than
gzip.
and compresses 10% better. I can't comment on compress.
Considering we're talking about compression methods to use on dump
output, that would seem to be the definition of a "realistic test
case". Telling us what it "normally" does without defining what input
is considered "normal" doesn't help much.
Source code in my case and various other documents. The test case above
certainly was not normal.
Joerg
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: emulate an end-of-media
- From: Mike Meyer
- Re: emulate an end-of-media
- References:
- Re: emulate an end-of-media
- From: Martin Laabs
- Re: emulate an end-of-media
- From: Mike Meyer
- Re: emulate an end-of-media
- From: Alex Zbyslaw
- Re: emulate an end-of-media
- From: Julian H. Stacey
- Re: emulate an end-of-media
- From: Tim Kientzle
- Re: emulate an end-of-media
- From: Martin Laabs
- Re: emulate an end-of-media
- From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: emulate an end-of-media
- From: Mike Meyer
- Re: emulate an end-of-media
- Prev by Date: Re: synchronous freebsd print
- Next by Date: Re: synchronous freebsd print
- Previous by thread: Re: emulate an end-of-media
- Next by thread: Re: emulate an end-of-media
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
- Re: speed of bzip2 versus gzip
... i never measured it to see if it is 50-60 times slower, but yes, gzip ... I
wanted to use bzip2 to compress ... then your goal is to obtain the absolute best compression,
... more reasonable if you care about reasonably timely compression. ... (freebsd-questions) - Re: speed of bzip2 versus gzip
... i never measured it to see if it is 50-60 times slower, but yes, gzip ... I
wanted to use bzip2 to compress ... then your goal is to obtain the absolute best compression,
... sys 0m0.257s ... (freebsd-questions) - Re: Linux Kernel Source Compression
... gzip is the winner again. ... usually two to six times more time than lzma,
that is, four to twelve ... decompress the faster the smaller the compressed size is, while bzip2
... gets slower when the compression ratio gets better. ... (Linux-Kernel) - Re: emulate an end-of-media
... the compression ratio on a dump of my home directory ... bzip2 took about
74min to compress, gzip only 11minutes. ... (freebsd-hackers) - Re: Dump + GZIP
... or di I need to create the dump first then gzip it after? ... Unless you're
dumping an unmounted filesystem, ... Does gzipping a file give a decent compression
ratio? ... Compression with gzip saved 50-60% on ... (freebsd-questions)