Re: find -lname and -ilname implemented
- From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:16:18 +0300
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:43:39PM -0700 M. Warner Losh mentioned:
:
: Please, don't commit C++ comments, that violates style(9). Also, gnu should be
: spelled as GNU.
Understood. Not that I'm going to change it, but understood.
Why not? You took a good peace of code, and now it looks inconsistent.
Because it makes it more compatible with existing de-facto standards.
It costs us very little to do so.
It costs extra complexity. A very important thing, though...
--
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- find -lname and -ilname implemented
- From: M. Warner Losh
- Re: find -lname and -ilname implemented
- From: M. Warner Losh
- Re: find -lname and -ilname implemented
- From: Stanislav Sedov
- Re: find -lname and -ilname implemented
- From: M. Warner Losh
- find -lname and -ilname implemented
- Prev by Date: Re: synchronous freebsd print
- Next by Date: Re: non-blocking io, EINTR
- Previous by thread: Re: find -lname and -ilname implemented
- Next by thread: find -lname and -ilname implemented
- Index(es):