Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate
- From: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:51:59 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Julian Elischer!
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:53:44 -0700; Julian Elischer wrote about 'Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate':
here are some of my ideas for ipfw changes:
1/ redo locking so that packets do not have to get locks on the
structure... I have several ideas on this
Currently the main need for locking arises for rule byte/packet counters. The
easiest short-term solution
2/ allow separate firewalls to be used at different parts of the
network stack (i.e allow multiple taboe sto co-exist)
Umm, could you explain it a little?..
3/ possibly keeping per CPU stats..
How that would be represented to user?
--
WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@xxxxxxx
[Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate
- References:
- [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate
- From: Vadim Goncharov
- Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate
- From: Marcelo Araujo
- Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate
- From: Julian Elischer
- [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate
- Prev by Date: Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate
- Next by Date: ports system woes
- Previous by thread: Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate
- Next by thread: Re: [HEADS UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate
- Index(es):