Re: binary compatibility query
- From: Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers2.e313df@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 15:27:18 -0400
On Sat, 10 May 2008 13:50:48 +0100 (BST)
Robert Watson <rwatson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
basically if you rely only on the standard posix interfaces and don't doFor "raw" UNIX applications, this rule of thumb works well, but not for
anything exotic then you will "probably" be safe.
applications that depend on third-party libraries, languages, or daemons.
You can lose the dependency on third party libraries by compiling your
application to a static binary. That will also help with the few
breakages that occur with the system libraries, and with compatibility
across major releases using the backwards compatX packages.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <mwm@xxxxxxxxx> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: binary compatibility query
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: binary compatibility query
- References:
- binary compatibility query
- From: Carl Shapiro
- Re: binary compatibility query
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: binary compatibility query
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: binary compatibility query
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: binary compatibility query
- From: Carl Shapiro
- Re: binary compatibility query
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: binary compatibility query
- From: Robert Watson
- binary compatibility query
- Prev by Date: My SoC2008 project: Porting BSD-licensed Text-Processing Tools from OpenBSD
- Next by Date: Re: binary compatibility query
- Previous by thread: Re: binary compatibility query
- Next by thread: Re: binary compatibility query
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|