Re: Improving the kernel/i386 timecounter performance (GSoC proposal)
- From: David Xu <davidxu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:39:59 +0800
Julian Elischer wrote:
depends on the hardware.
anyhow I was only saying it was possible, not necessarily
good or even useful.
I had done some works for thread private page shared by kernel
and userland when I was doing userland spinlock, if userland asks
a page, kernel will allocate it and put some interesting thing in
it by scheduler etcs, these code may be useful.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Re: Improving the kernel/i386 timecounter performance (GSoC proposal)
- From: Sergey Babkin
- Re: Improving the kernel/i386 timecounter performance (GSoC proposal)
- From: Scott Long
- Re: Improving the kernel/i386 timecounter performance (GSoC proposal)
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: Improving the kernel/i386 timecounter performance (GSoC proposal)
- From: David Xu
- Re: Improving the kernel/i386 timecounter performance (GSoC proposal)
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: Re: Improving the kernel/i386 timecounter performance (GSoC proposal)
- Prev by Date: Re: Shared Disk/Transactional/Distributed file system (GSoC Proposal)
- Next by Date: Re: Improving the kernel/i386 timecounter performance (GSoC proposal)
- Previous by thread: Re: Improving the kernel/i386 timecounter performance (GSoC proposal)
- Next by thread: Re: Improving the kernel/i386 timecounter performance (GSoC proposal)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|