Re: Make process title - % complete
- From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:35:08 +0200
2009/10/19 Rink Springer <rink@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Ivan,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 03:52:30PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
if nobody objects, I'll commit it :)
I seem to recall that setproctitle() is quite expensive to call; perhaps
it would make sense offer a flag to prevent make(1) from calling it? [1]
Anyway, the feature looks nice! I'd like to have it...
[1] I'm unsure how expensive it is compared to fork(1)-ing etc; I'd
expect it's negligable but who knows...
The loop it's called in is not processed bazillion times per second
(though it *is* called surprisingly often; small, fast jobs can result
in somewhere in the order of magnitude of 100 iterations per second on
a fast CPU). As you said - I expect it's negligable compared to fork()
and the work jobs themselves do.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Make process title - % complete
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: Make process title - % complete
- From: Rink Springer
- Make process title - % complete
- Prev by Date: Re: Make process title - % complete
- Next by Date: Re: Make process title - % complete
- Previous by thread: Re: Make process title - % complete
- Next by thread: Re: Make process title - % complete
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
