Re: [RFC] Replacing our regex implementation
- From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
--- On Sun, 5/8/11, Bakul Shah <bakul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
C++ may be an impediment for it to go into libc but one
can certainly put a C interface on a C++ library.
I wouldn't think it's very consistent to use C++ in libc.
Perhaps we could have the best of both worlds by using
libtre as the libc regex replacement and re2 for grep
and diff? As an extra benefit using Re2 would make it
easier to support --perl-regex in grep.
cheers,
Pedro.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: [RFC] Replacing our regex implementation
- From: Bakul Shah
- Re: [RFC] Replacing our regex implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Replacing our regex implementation
- Next by Date: Re: [UPDATE] New Boot-Loader Menu -- version 1.4
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Replacing our regex implementation
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Replacing our regex implementation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|