Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?)

From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 19:33:43 -0400

<<On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 16:17:53 -0700, Doug Barton <dougb@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:

BIND in the base today comes with a full-featured local resolver
configuration, which I'm confident that Dag-Erling can do for unbound
(and which I would be glad to assist with if needed). Other than that,
what integration are you concerned about?

The utilities (specifically host(1) and dig(1)) are the only
user-visible interfaces I care about. I don't see any need for there
to be an authoritative name server in the base system. So long as the
resolver works properly and does DNSsec validation....

-GAWollman
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?)
  - From: Wojciech Puchar
- Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?)
  - From: Warner Losh
- Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?)
  - From: Doug Barton

References:
- Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?
  - From: Robert Simmons
- Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?
  - From: Doug Barton
- Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?
  - From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?
  - From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
- Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?)
  - From: Doug Barton

Prev by Date: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?)
Next by Date: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?)
Previous by thread: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?)
Next by thread: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?)
... configuration, which I'm confident that Dag-Erling can do for unbound ...
(freebsd-hackers)
Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?)
... which I'm confident that Dag-Erling can do for unbound ... what integration are you concerned about? ... I'd like to see us produce a host-alike based on ldns as well, ...
(freebsd-hackers)
Re: Need Programming Help
... > around it leaves the *possibility* of accidentally modifying an employee ... > wouldn't feel 100% confident that it would always work without ... > you'll also have to use code in, maybe, the form's BeforeInsert event, ... > If the combo box is unbound, you can freely use it for navigation. ...
(microsoft.public.access.formscoding)
Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?)
... which I'm confident that Dag-Erling can do for unbound ... to be an authoritative name server in the base system. ... With the proper ports infrastructure, ... we're already in basic agreement that importing unbound into ...
(freebsd-hackers)