Re: About DNS (BIND) with Database
From: Simon Gray (simong_at_desktop-guardian.com)
Date: 11/17/03
- Previous message: Simon ***: "RE: About DNS (BIND) with Database"
- In reply to: Vahric MUHTARYAN: "RE: About DNS (BIND) with Database"
- Next in thread: Len Conrad: "Re: About DNS (BIND) with Database"
- Reply: Len Conrad: "Re: About DNS (BIND) with Database"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "Vahric MUHTARYAN" <vahric@doruk.net.tr> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:19:00 -0000
> Bind9 ( name server x.x.x.2)
> Mydns x.x.x.3 (
> database )
> Bind9 ( name server x.x.x.1)
> Bind9 (
> secondary )
>
> in this environment ;
personally i wouldn't use bind, its had a bad security history.
tinydns/djbdns would be my prefered method. As for your design, seems ok but
replication is definatly the easier way - No generating horrible bind
confs/zone files :/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Simon ***: "RE: About DNS (BIND) with Database"
- In reply to: Vahric MUHTARYAN: "RE: About DNS (BIND) with Database"
- Next in thread: Len Conrad: "Re: About DNS (BIND) with Database"
- Reply: Len Conrad: "Re: About DNS (BIND) with Database"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]