Re: Anybody Use 2 or More CPU at Production Env. ( SMP )

From: Adam Maloney (adamm_at_sihope.com)
Date: 12/18/03

  • Next message: Lawrence Farr: "RE: Anybody Use 2 or More CPU at Production Env. ( SMP )"
    To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
    Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:03:15 -0600
    
    

    > I watching freebsd-stable list I saw that somebody have a problem
    > with SMP support which they are using 4.9 . I know that some improvement are

    Hey, that was me!

    > coming with 5.x .... But this problem are very important for example
    > somebody when enable SMP support system start to reset itself or under high
    > load crashed ?!!!!!
    >
    Ours went down regardless of load - it was very consistent, every 30
    minutes. This is the first time that we've had an issue with it. As I
    said in my post to -stable, we ran it as SMP under 4.8-REL and 4.8-STA
    perfectly until we upgraded to 4.9 in late November. The GENERIC
    4.9-STA kernel worked fine for a couple of weeks without SMP turned on.
    It was just on Tuesday when we re-built the kernel with SMP support that
    we had the problems. For now we have gone back to single-processor mode
    and are operating normally again.

    > I wonder Does anybody use SMP Support without Problem . Because SMP
    > is very important things ...
    >
    > I wonder too What about HyperThreading ?!
    >
    We had "options HTT" defined in the config under 4.8, but under 4.9 you
    don't have to specify it anymore. So the only changes we made from the
    GENERIC kernel were "options SMP" and "options APIC_IO"

    I will (hesitantly, hoping to avoid the inevitable flame war that will
    follow) admit that the system is a Compaq Proliant 5500R with 4x500MHz
    Xeons. This is the only compaq we have, and the only multi-processor
    system we have running FreeBSD, so I can't compare our problems to
    anything else.

    I think in general the SMP support in FreeBSD is very good, and very
    stable. I'm relatively certain that my problem is specific to my
    hardware (IRQ sharing maybe). I can only pray that the FreeBSD gods
    have some further troubleshooting steps for me (I haven't checked the
    -stable list for replies yet...I'll cross my fingers).

    Adam Maloney
    Systems Administrator
    Sihope Communications

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Lawrence Farr: "RE: Anybody Use 2 or More CPU at Production Env. ( SMP )"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: FreeBSD and SMP support
      ... > I'm after some general information on SMP support on FreeBSD. ... > I've been running FreeBSD 5.1 for a couple of months as a Web server on a ... Although apparently performance has drastically improved in MySQL 4 ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • re: Wierd time changes
      ... I am experiencing the same problem on my dual PII-450 SP700 Compaq Pro ... it is pointing to the FreeBSD ... It takes 25 seconds on my SMP workstation to execute a 10 second delay. ... exclude the SMP support. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Wierd time changes
      ... Denis R. wrote: ... > Hi Mark and list members, ... it is pointing to the FreeBSD ... > exclude the SMP support. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • SMP on SMP-capable system with one processor
      ... We have several Dell-based systems that are dual-processor capable, ... The FreeBSD 4.9 kernels for each system is compiled with ... SMP support, even though there is only one processor on each system right ... that SMP kernels have to worry about special locking, ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Code density and performance?
      ... turned out to be kernel restructuring for integrity and smp support. ... another part of the resource manager was attempting to better identify ... it was much more dynamic arm access optimization ... ...
      (comp.arch)