RE: Handling 100.000 packets/sec or more
From: Sten Daniel Sørsdal (sten.daniel.sorsdal_at_wan.no)
Date: 01/14/04
- Previous message: Tony Frank: "Re: Routing Networks"
- Maybe in reply to: Adrian Penisoara: "Handling 100.000 packets/sec or more"
- Next in thread: Richard Wendland: "Re: Handling 100.000 packets/sec or more"
- Reply: Richard Wendland: "Re: Handling 100.000 packets/sec or more"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:22:25 +0100 To: "Adrian Penisoara" <ady@freebsd.ady.ro>, <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
>
> What can I do to make the system better handle this kind of
> traffic ?
> Could device polling(8) or just increasing the kernel
> frequency clock to 1000Hz or more improve the situation ?
> What kind of network cards could face a lot better this
> burden ? Are there any other solutions ?
>
device polling(8) really does help _alot_ for packet floods/storms.
for device polling to work properly (imho) you would need to set HZ to 1000.
I dont recommend any higher HZ on a PIII.
I recommend Intel cards (fxp or em) because they chew through packets at
the highest rate (in our tests) given good supporting hardware and tuned software.
Both support device polling.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Tony Frank: "Re: Routing Networks"
- Maybe in reply to: Adrian Penisoara: "Handling 100.000 packets/sec or more"
- Next in thread: Richard Wendland: "Re: Handling 100.000 packets/sec or more"
- Reply: Richard Wendland: "Re: Handling 100.000 packets/sec or more"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]