Re: tape backup from remote
From: Bob Martin (bob_at_buckhorn.net)
Date: 03/30/04
- Previous message: Dan Vande More: "Re: tape backup from remote"
- In reply to: Dan Vande More: "Re: tape backup from remote"
- Next in thread: Sean Ellis: "Re: tape backup from remote"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:55:30 -0600 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
I'm guessing that the reason that there are many options is that there
are many [different] needs.
I didn't mean to disparage amanda. It's solid code, and been around for
years.
Another option that has gained a lot of momentum and popularity is doing
away with the tapes all together and just dumping to disk. Not a good
fit for all, but an excellent fit for many.
Bob
Dan Vande More wrote:
> Some people/networks see no problems with rdump. In most cases, I myself
> would recommend amanda though.
> Amanda has the distinct advantage of being able to spool data to the
> "holding disk" at which point another utility writes this to the tape.
> This eliminates the t(h?)rashing Christoph mentioned.
> This is almost word for word out of the documenation.
>
> http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda.html
>
> Amanda can also be configured to compress on the client, and send to the
> server. This is much more efficient than transferring text files, etc.
>
> HTH,
>
> Dan Vande More
>
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Dan Vande More: "Re: tape backup from remote"
- In reply to: Dan Vande More: "Re: tape backup from remote"
- Next in thread: Sean Ellis: "Re: tape backup from remote"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]