Re: bridge with ipf or ipfw
From: Hernan Nuņez (hnunez_at_vianetworks.com.ar)
Date: 04/13/04
- Previous message: Renato Frederick: "RES: bridge with ipf or ipfw"
- In reply to: Theodore Knab: "bridge with ipf or ipfw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:59:05 -0300
We are using ipfw in a PIII 700Mhz with 2 Fast Ehternet cards. The Net load is about 6Mbits/s out and 2Mbits/s in.
It've been working excelent.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Theodore Knab" <tjk@annapolislinux.org>
To: <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:57 AM
Subject: bridge with ipf or ipfw
> I was wondering which firewall application works better
> with bridged fire-walls. Currently, I have a basic familiarity with
> ipfw and ipf.
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------
> Ted Knab
> Chester, Maryland 21619 USA
> ------------------------------------------
> Conquest is easy. Control is not.
> -- Kirk, "Mirror, Mirror", stardate unknown
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Renato Frederick: "RES: bridge with ipf or ipfw"
- In reply to: Theodore Knab: "bridge with ipf or ipfw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
