Re: Traffic Monitor
From: Kurt Jaeger (lists_at_complx.LF.net)
Date: 04/22/04
- Previous message: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse: "RE: Traffic Monitor"
- In reply to: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse: "RE: Traffic Monitor"
- Next in thread: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse: "RE: Traffic Monitor"
- Reply: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse: "RE: Traffic Monitor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:21:31 +0200 To: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse <admin-lists@wolfpaw.net>
Hi!
> > to a 100base switch. The reason I used the 10base HUB is
> > because it broadcasts all the data to all the ports. So for
> > all data to and from the firewall will be caught by the
> > Monitoring BSD box. I hope this makes sense.
>
> That is an _extremely_ bad idea. Hubs have major collisions,
Yes, but he only has a 256 kbit uplink. Therefore, that's OK.
-- MfG/Best regards, Kurt Jaeger 16 years to go ! LF.net GmbH fon +49 711 90074-23 pi@LF.net Ruppmannstr. 27 fax +49 711 90074-33 D-70565 Stuttgart mob +49 171 3101372 _______________________________________________ freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse: "RE: Traffic Monitor"
- In reply to: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse: "RE: Traffic Monitor"
- Next in thread: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse: "RE: Traffic Monitor"
- Reply: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse: "RE: Traffic Monitor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|