Re: How do fix a good solution against spam..

From: Cirelle Enterprises (gcirino_at_cirelle.com)
Date: 05/14/04

  • Next message: Joan Picanyol i Puig: "Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.." 
    To: <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 07:30:30 -0400

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Joan Picanyol" <lists-freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
    To: <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
    Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 6:34 AM
    Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam..

    | * roberto@redix.it <roberto@redix.it> [20040513 23:48]:
    | > 2) use Sender Policy Framework (see http://spf.pobox.com);
    |
    | http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/smtp-spf-is-harmful.html
    |
    | qvb
    | --
    | pica

    Actually, SPF is not a spam tool. It was designed
    to protect against the Joe Job and only if everyone adopts it.

    Anything beyond this is a stretch.

    The rest of the complaints in the spf is harmful link are moot
    as a growing trend is to do away with certain portions of RFC's
    such as bounces.

    We have put it in place to monitor the results, and contrary to the
    article, AOL has not adopted the policy, all they have done is place
    a DNS text entry indicating anybody using an AOL address is ok with
    them.

    We do tag email that has an out and out SPF failure so our content
    filters can have their way with it.

    Regards
    Greg
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: Joan Picanyol i Puig: "Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.."