Re: Documentation of big "mail systems"?
From: Jo Geraerts (geraerts.jo_at_skynet.be)
Date: 10/14/04
- Previous message: Guido van Rooij: "intel asp 2150"
- In reply to: Stephane Bortzmeyer: "Documentation of big "mail systems"?"
- Next in thread: Frode Nordahl: "Re: Documentation of big "mail systems"?"
- Reply: Frode Nordahl: "Re: Documentation of big "mail systems"?"
- Reply: Jett Tayer: "Re: Documentation of big "mail systems"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 19:39:07 +0200 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
hi,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:20:51PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> I'm currently writing a proposal for a webmail service for, say, 50
> 000 to 500 000 users. I'm looking for description of existing "big
> mail" systems, using technologies like scalemail
> (http://scalemail.sourceforge.net/), specially with an emphasis on the
> storage subsystem for the servers (my weak point, I don't really have
> enough experience with SAN, NAS, and so on).
i would seriously consider a qmail-ldap system as backend. Especially the
clustering feature is very nice. With this clustering you can simply use
off-the-shelf hardware and balance the mailboxes over the mailstores (
as i call them.)
a mail may enter the cluster at any system and it will be queued on the
right system. qmail-ldap has also a password check for courier-imap
which redirects the imap session to the right mailstore. so it behaves
as a single system with lots of mailstorage but you don't need pricy
nas/san systems. Another advantage is that it scales pretty good since
you dont have a single point ( like a nas) where everything comes
together.
i've a mail setup with 1 MX server, 2 mailstores and a relay server
which servers about 130 000 people with simple commodity hardware: dual
p3, 1 gig mem and 2 IDE harddisks. The dual processor is a little bit
oversized but we use the same server for everything.
if you want advanced filtering and anti-spam features, put
postfix/exim/... in front of the qmail-ldap cluster. ( qmail-scanner is
so not done on large systems, since it requires a perl invocation per
connection)
As webmail i use squirrelmail, but i think i made the wrong choice. The
problem with this setup is that it makes a imap connection for every
pagerequest. If I had to redesign a new webmail system, i think i would
use something that supports persistent imap connections ( some kind of
servlet or zope application)
best regards,
jo
-- /****************************************************************** * Geraerts Jo * Politics: * * jo@umask.net * Poly: many * * http://umask.net * Ticks: blood sucking parasites * ******************************************************************/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Guido van Rooij: "intel asp 2150"
- In reply to: Stephane Bortzmeyer: "Documentation of big "mail systems"?"
- Next in thread: Frode Nordahl: "Re: Documentation of big "mail systems"?"
- Reply: Frode Nordahl: "Re: Documentation of big "mail systems"?"
- Reply: Jett Tayer: "Re: Documentation of big "mail systems"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|