SATA vs SCSI RAID 5?
From: Gerald (gcoon_at_inch.com)
Date: 01/11/05
- Previous message: root_at_hapag24.de: "virus found in sent message "Re: dokument""
- Next in thread: Justin Hopper: "Re: SATA vs SCSI RAID 5?"
- Reply: Justin Hopper: "Re: SATA vs SCSI RAID 5?"
- Reply: Simon: "Re: SATA vs SCSI RAID 5?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:50:49 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
I recently setup a SATA RAID1 box on a highpoint controller. The
machine is playing very nicely with FreeBSD and doing much better than
I initially expected. Now I'm considering upgrading a SCSI system to
another SATA RAID 5 system.
Can anyone tell me about SATA RAID 5 experiences? The company I'm
looking at purchasing this from is using the Highpoint R1820 controller.
SATA= "putting the 'I' back in RAID" or "magic 8 ball says, 'Ask again
later."?
For reference on the decision making, the present machine is setup on an
Adaptec 3200S with all but one of the partitions as RAID1 and the last
one as RAID5. All the drives in the present system are SCSI SCA 10k RPMs
I believe. The machine is primarily an apache 1.3/freeBSD 4 web server
doing 25-30 MB of web traffic at peak 17-20 MB on Average.
Gerald
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: root_at_hapag24.de: "virus found in sent message "Re: dokument""
- Next in thread: Justin Hopper: "Re: SATA vs SCSI RAID 5?"
- Reply: Justin Hopper: "Re: SATA vs SCSI RAID 5?"
- Reply: Simon: "Re: SATA vs SCSI RAID 5?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|