Re: SpamAssassian with FreeBSD and Big Mail Server

From: Christian Damm (christian.damm_at_diewebmaster.at)
Date: 02/25/05

  • Next message: Suporte Matik: "Re: SpamAssassian with FreeBSD and Big Mail Server"
    Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:24:55 +0100
    To: Suporte Matik <asstec@matik.com.br>
    
    

    Suporte Matik schrieb:
    > On Thursday 24 February 2005 06:32, Christian Damm wrote:
    >
    >>thomas@hkeasyhost.com schrieb:
    >>
    >>>I would like to try dspam as well as I am using spamassassin, but dspam
    >>>are leak of docs on postfix supporting, and no one got experience with
    >>
    >>i can encourage you to do so - you wont regret it: the statistical spam
    >>filtering methods in dspam are miles ahead spamassassin`s (spamassassin
    >>on the other hand is an antispam framework where so many things can be
    >>done (rbl`s, razor, dcc, spf etc.) - i do things like rbl checking
    >>(wirespeed) on the smtp level with postfix so i dont mind.
    >>the postfix integration is dead-easy, really. the dspam docs could be
    >>better but the dspam mailinglist is quite helpful if you got questions.
    >>also consider using one of the many postfix/dspam/etc. howto`s out there:
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    > I am not so sure here
    > I tried several different setups of Dspam and on small test servers 100 users
    > or so it actually worked but even so the false-positive rate was very high,
    > actually too high.

    my false positive rate is around 0.01% - and we are talking >50k
    userbases here. if you need some out-of-the-box solution SA is fine -
    thats not what dspam really was made for. in the long run dspam is much
    more reliable/scaleable.

    but agreed, dspam requires some real tweaking and RTFM...
    http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam/howtotest.txt

    > But another test server with only 2000 user dspam is lost already and it
    > didn't matter which store method I tried out, even a MySQL for it only. It

    mysql is really a must when it comes to dspam - the pgsql support is ok,
    but bdb sucks! i dont blame dspam for that, bdb is the pig here.
    agreed, running dspam as your only weapon against spam can really load
    your boxes in medium sized environments - but there are many
    possibilities to tune dspam for high load.

    > runs a day or two but soon a spam wave comes in message delivery time grows
    > up, memory goes up, the queue fills the disks and swap is eaten until the
    > server goes down on his knees. When I tried to get some numbers nobody
    > answered clearly and I only hear ohh I have lots of users but I never saw
    > something real.

    i give you all the numbers you want - just ask. ;-)

    >
    > spamassassin on the other side with good rules maintanance is hitting fine, I
    > get almost no false-positives and almost all spam is correctly identifies
    > which we drop into a spam folder with procmail. That is cool, no memory
    > excess and absolutly stable and reliable.

    1.) procmail is slow (even maildrop is, altough its 3 times faster)

    2.) you have to maintain your SA ruleset

    3.) SA is a perl bloat (anyway - i like it) - thats also one of the
    reasons i want to drop amavisd-new off my boxes when i find a good
    alternative...

    >
    >
    > Hans
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >>http://devnull.com/kyler/dspam.20040609.html
    >>
    >>
    >>>dspam+Spamassassin together, so...
    >>
    >>the latest amavisd-new versions got dspam support - anyway its a little
    >>bit "hacky" at the moment i.m.h.o, so i wouldnt really use it on
    >>production hosts (some might disagree in small mta environments).
    >>
    >>
    >>>>Vahric MUHTARYAN schrieb:
    >>>>
    >>>>>Hi Everybody ,
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Really I don't know can I say a big mail server which have
    >>>>>30,000 mailbox on it 1200+ simultaneously connections
    >>>>>(pop,smtp,webmail).
    >>>>>Ýncoming smtp connections are between 200-400 . We want to run spam
    >>>>>software
    >>>>>on it but machine can't handle it for this reason we seperated machine
    >>>>>freebsd+exim+SpamAssassian but on 400 connection machine goes down
    >>>>>average
    >>>>>is very high , cpu usage really too high .
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I want to learn Anybody Who have closer or bigger system and
    >>>>>using SpamAssassian ?!
    >>>>>Really this 400 connection simultaneously can be limit for spam software
    >>>>>?!
    >>>>>I mean Anybody can handle more ?!
    >>>>>I have to design distributed environment ?!
    >>>>>
    >>>>>My Hardware is (for spam)
    >>>>> 2 X PIII 1G + 1 GB RAM + 2 DISK RAID 0 SCSI 10000 RPM
    >>>>
    >>>>i use spamassassin only on small-/medium-sized MTA installations (its a
    >>>>memory/cpu hog i.m.h.o. but i like it) - on all my "bigger" systems i
    >>>>really prefer dspam (coded in straight C and fast as hell). it is used
    >>>>in some environments with 350,000 email users and scales really well (if
    >>>>you have the iron and experience to build/maintain such a
    >>>>system/cluster).
    >>>>
    >>>>http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam/
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>>Thanks
    >>>>>Vahric
    >>>>>
    >>>>>_______________________________________________
    >>>>>freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
    >>>>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
    >>>>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    >>>>
    >>>>--
    >>>>
    >>>>mfg.
    >>>>
    >>>>christian damm
    >>>>technische leitung
    >>>>phone: dw 42
    >>>>email: christian.damm@diewebmaster.at
    >>>>icq at work: 124464652
    >>>>
    >>>>die webmaster - flötzerweg 156 - 4030 linz - austria
    >>>>phone: +43-732-381242, fax: +43-732-381242-22, isdn (leonardo):
    >>>>+43-732-381242-33
    >>>>homepage: www.diewebmaster.at, public email: office@diewebmaster.at
    >>>>_______________________________________________
    >>>>freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
    >>>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
    >>>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    >>>
    >>>!DSPAM:421d64a4175283000910921!
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > !DSPAM:421db801170271219614910!

    -- 
    mfg.
    christian damm
    technische leitung
    phone: dw 42
    email: christian.damm@diewebmaster.at
    icq at work: 124464652
    die webmaster - flötzerweg 156 - 4030 linz - austria
    phone: +43-732-381242, fax: +43-732-381242-22, isdn (leonardo):
    +43-732-381242-33
    homepage: www.diewebmaster.at, public email: office@diewebmaster.at
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Suporte Matik: "Re: SpamAssassian with FreeBSD and Big Mail Server"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: Getting a new server
      ... Subject: Getting a new server ... spamassassin can EASILY be set up to allow the users ... I just feed all my spam in and my ... dspam makes it so rediculously easy for both POP and IMAP ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: [Full-Disclosure] Spam with PGP
      ... Heuristic filters are based on a set of static rules which identify ... DSPAM and SpamAssassin. ... individual characteristics of spam. ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • Re: How do fix a good solution against spam..
      ... On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 21:00, Jesper Wallin wrote: ... I recently switched from SpamAssassin to an open source program called ... DSPAM. ... was spam or innocent, and the spam probability of the e-mail. ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)
    • Re[2]: SpamAssassian with FreeBSD and Big Mail Server
      ... >> filtering methods in dspam are miles ahead spamassassin`s (spamassassin ... >> better but the dspam mailinglist is quite helpful if you got questions. ... > runs a day or two but soon a spam wave comes in message delivery time grows ... > spamassassin on the other side with good rules maintanance is hitting fine, ...
      (freebsd-isp)
    • Re: SpamAssassian with FreeBSD and Big Mail Server
      ... >> I would like to try dspam as well as I am using spamassassin, ... I tried several different setups of Dspam and on small test servers 100 users ... runs a day or two but soon a spam wave comes in message delivery time grows ...
      (freebsd-isp)

  • Quantcast