Re: Mail Server recommendations (digest)
From: Jim Durham (jimd_at_nepinc.com)
Date: 04/29/05
- Previous message: Jim Durham: "Re: Mail Server recommendations"
- In reply to: Christian Damm: "Re: Mail Server recommendations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:49:10 -0400
I'd like to thank everyone who replied with useful suggestions to
my mail server request. It would be too much to post all the
replies, so....
The consensus seems to be that a solution using separate machines
for virus and spam scanning ahead of the server that provides
smtp and pop services to the users would be a more 'elegant'
solution than bigger iron.
The solution that seems good to me after sifting all the
responses is to load-balance port 25 and feed 2 or 3 machines
that virus and spam scan email and then relay it to the MTA on
the machine with the user's mailboxes.
I'm using 'balance' from ports to load balance our Citrix servers
and it seems to work quite well. I will probably try this for
port 25.
Christian Damm asked questions regarding the ratio of spam to
ham, and number of virus emails. I was suprised to see that we
are scanning and rejecting at least 2000 emails a day for spam
and about 30 for viruses. IOW, there are more spams than
legitimate emails. 'sma' says we are doing about 2700 emails
per day.
So thanks, Christian, Ari, Chuck, Matthew, Freddie, Lawrence and
Steve. All good suggestions.
Now...how do I do this in between fixing XP problems?
-Jim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Jim Durham: "Re: Mail Server recommendations"
- In reply to: Christian Damm: "Re: Mail Server recommendations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|