Re: rndc reload and BIND9
From: Jett Tayer (jett_at_angdatingdaan.org)
Date: 07/06/05
- Previous message: John Von Essen: "rndc reload and BIND9"
- In reply to: John Von Essen: "rndc reload and BIND9"
- Next in thread: John Von Essen: "Re: rndc reload and BIND9"
- Reply: John Von Essen: "Re: rndc reload and BIND9"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:23:00 +0800 (SGT) To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
a master/slave relationship is better. and will only "zone transfer" what
has changed :)
>
> Following a post I had about BIND9, I need to verify a certain behavior
> with BIND9 and issuing a rndc reload.
>
> Instead, of having a master and slave, I am going to have two masters. One
> master is the real master, the other gets replicated via rsync. The main
> reason for this approach is to cut down on all the zone transfers (we
> have 12,000 domains).
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: John Von Essen: "rndc reload and BIND9"
- In reply to: John Von Essen: "rndc reload and BIND9"
- Next in thread: John Von Essen: "Re: rndc reload and BIND9"
- Reply: John Von Essen: "Re: rndc reload and BIND9"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|