Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?
From: Francisco Reyes (lists_at_natserv.com)
Date: 10/15/05
- Previous message: Peter Clutton: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- In reply to: Peter Clutton: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Next in thread: Aaron Glenn: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Reply: Aaron Glenn: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:33:25 -0400 (EDT) To: Peter Clutton <peterclutton@gmail.com>
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Peter Clutton wrote:
> Well questions of which one are all a matter of opinion. LDAP is an
> established implementation of the .x500 standard, and the open version
> OpenLDAP can run with a mysql backend. It sounds like it would fulfil
> your needs.
Will take a look.
> Kerberos is an authentication protocol rather than a directory
So Kerberos would be more along the lines of users login in to the
machines?
> service, and NIS is a simple directory service introduced by Sun.
Between LDAP and NIS which one would you consider to be:
1- More secure
2- Easier to maintain
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Peter Clutton: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- In reply to: Peter Clutton: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Next in thread: Aaron Glenn: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Reply: Aaron Glenn: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]