Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?
From: Aaron Glenn (aaron.glenn_at_gmail.com)
Date: 10/16/05
- Previous message: Francisco Reyes: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- In reply to: Francisco Reyes: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Next in thread: Francisco Reyes: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Reply: Francisco Reyes: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:47:31 -0700 To: Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com>
On 10/15/05, Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com> wrote:
>
> So Kerberos would be more along the lines of users login in to the
> machines?
Exactly. The problem I've always had is, what happens when you can
reach the device, but the device can't reach any KDC (for whatever
reason)? How can one fall back on another authentication method while
maintaining consistant login credentials? Food for thought...
> > service, and NIS is a simple directory service introduced by Sun.
>
> Between LDAP and NIS which one would you consider to be:
> 1- More secure
> 2- Easier to maintain
I would say LDAP, but then I've never used NIS.
regards,
aaron.glenn
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Francisco Reyes: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- In reply to: Francisco Reyes: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Next in thread: Francisco Reyes: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Reply: Francisco Reyes: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|