Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?
From: Francisco (francisco_at_natserv.net)
Date: 10/18/05
- Previous message: Foojian Lee: "ss"
- In reply to: Tillman Hodgson: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Next in thread: Tillman Hodgson: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Reply: Tillman Hodgson: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:37:53 -0400 (EDT) To: Tillman Hodgson <tillman@seekingfire.com>
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> It has some interoperability and security issues. They're solvable, IMO.
Thanks for the feedback.
I guess a good test is to ask.. what would you use? :-)
> For example, most of the security concerns can be addressed with a
> combination of transport-mode IPsec and Kerberos and I avoid inter-
> operability issues by avoiding weird implementations of NIS ;-)
Sounds like more trouble than it's worth.
Right now I am leaning towards Kerberos or LDAP.
Need to learn more about them to see their strengths and weaknesses and
how it would fit into our existing extructure.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Foojian Lee: "ss"
- In reply to: Tillman Hodgson: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Next in thread: Tillman Hodgson: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Reply: Tillman Hodgson: "Re: Distributed authentication. Which one?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
