Re: [OT] Domain Name Registrars
- From: Duane Whitty <duane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 21:27:43 -0300
Doug Barton wrote:
Troy Settle wrote:To clarify for myself, the root name servers are not authoritative for (most of) the TLDs.
Here's the thing for name servers (at least as far as I understand
it)...
With all due respect, the problem with postings like this is that it
actually slows down the process of people finding out the truth for
themselves by perpetuating misinformation. It's far better to either do the
research and post accurate information, or avoid posting.
the glue records must exist in the root servers for each registry.
A) The only "root servers" are those that serve the root zone. What you're
referring to are Top Level Domain (TLD) name servers.
The authoritative name servers for zones represented by the TLDs are the ones to which the root
name servers have delegated authority to for those zones. So there are authoritative name
servers for the zones such as .ca, .gc.ca, .com etc. However I have determined, using nslookup,
that for the .mil zone four of the root servers are authoritative, as one example.
B) Policies on whetherSo then what the registrars are doing (or supposed to be doing) is providing A and NS records
name server IP records are necessary for domain registration vary by
registry. There is no hard and fast rule. C) "Glue" is a DNS term of art
that refers specifically to IP addresses for servers whose hostnames are IN
the zone they serve. For example, if you have the following NS records:
example.org. NS ns1.example.org.
example.org. NS ns2.example.org.
Then glue records are _required_ in the ORG TLD name servers. Otherwise
there is no way for anyone to reach your servers.
for the name servers in my parent zone which point to my primary name servers and
secondary name servers? This then is the "glue" which makes recursive queries possible.
So, and pardon my verbosity, when a resolver needs to resolve dwlabs.ca, assuming it doesn't
have the data cached, it queries one of ca0[1,2,4,5,6].cira.ca or ns-ext.isc.org, which then
responds with the names and ip addresses of the authoritative name servers for dwlabs.ca.
Am I correct?
However, for those situations where the name server hostnames are all out ofSo no glue, but an NS record as in
zone, it's generally better to avoid putting IP address records for those
hostnames in the parent zone (regardless of what level we're talking about
here) because it makes the administration of the zones/domains much more
difficult.
If your name servers are under the .ca TLD, and you're
registering a .com domain, then the .com registry must have the glue
records for your .ca name servers.
That's actually exactly the opposite of the truth. If the name servers for
your COM name are in CA, then the IP addresses can be resolved the normal
way (recursively).
example.com. IN NS ns1.dwlabs.ca. ?
In this case the response to the resolver query from the .com authoritative name server
will be that the unauthoritative answer is ns1.dwlabs.ca. Authoritative answers can be
found at ca0[1,2,4,5,6].cira.ca or ns-ext.isc.org. ? Because of this they don't need A records
for my domain, if I am correct.
So the privilege and responsibility of being a registrar includes , in addition to selling globally
unique domain names, is in getting and validating information from your clients regarding their
name servers and then passing on the information to parent zone name servers so that the
appropriate A records and NS records can be created and or updated (in a timely fashion).
Much thanks and respect to all for helping me start to truly understand this.As an OpenSRS reseller,
eek,
Doug
Sincerely
Duane Whitty
--
duane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] Domain Name Registrars
- From: Doug Barton
- Re: [OT] Domain Name Registrars
- From: Brian Candler
- Re: [OT] Domain Name Registrars
- References:
- [OT] Domain Name Registrars
- From: Duane Whitty
- Re: [OT] Domain Name Registrars
- From: Duane Whitty
- Re: [OT] Domain Name Registrars
- From: Troy Settle
- Re: [OT] Domain Name Registrars
- From: Doug Barton
- [OT] Domain Name Registrars
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Domain Name Registrars
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] Domain Name Registrars
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Domain Name Registrars
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] Domain Name Registrars
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|