Re: Recovery from disk+fs crash
- From: Robin Elfrink <elfrink@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 16:55:24 +0200
John Brooks wrote:
how does the rest of the disk look? is the math correct
when you run "disklabel da0"?
'disklabel da0' says 'no valid label found'.
Did you mean da0s1 ?
root@:~# disklabel da0s1
# /dev/da0s1:
8 partitions:
# size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
a: 524288 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 32776
b: 2046640 524288 swap
c: 142335837 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part.
don't edit
d: 524288 2570928 4.2BSD 2048 16384 32776
e: 524288 3095216 4.2BSD 2048 16384 32776
f: 138716333 3619504 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552
Looks OK to me.
Robin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- RE: Recovery from disk+fs crash
- From: John Brooks
- RE: Recovery from disk+fs crash
- Prev by Date: Re: Recovery from disk+fs crash
- Next by Date: Re: Recovery from disk+fs crash
- Previous by thread: RE: Recovery from disk+fs crash
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|