Re: ftpd vs. lukemftpd (forcing FTP-uploaded ...)
- From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:35:21 -0400
понеділок 17 липень 2006 15:16, James Ryan написав:
If you don't mind waiting until the file finishes transferring to
examine it
But I do, actually. The files we deal with measure in gigabytes, and take a
while to transfer even over fat pipes. Rejecting the uncompressed ones right
away is better, than after the initiator has come back from his lunch.
This means you can make a convenient string to regex, such as "date|user|
action|file".
With any kind of post-transfer verification, there is no reliable way to
notify the user of his/her failure... I think, the quick rejection should
delivered via the FTProtocol itself, so the user's FTP-client shows it --
instantly.
-mi
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- forcing FTP-uploaded files to be of certain types only
- From: Mikhail Teterin
- ftpd vs. lukemftpd (forcing FTP-uploaded ...)
- From: Mikhail Teterin
- Re: ftpd vs. lukemftpd (forcing FTP-uploaded ...)
- From: James Ryan
- forcing FTP-uploaded files to be of certain types only
- Prev by Date: Re: ftpd vs. lukemftpd (forcing FTP-uploaded ...)
- Next by Date: Server Hardware Recommendations
- Previous by thread: Re: ftpd vs. lukemftpd (forcing FTP-uploaded ...)
- Next by thread: Re: forcing FTP-uploaded files to be of certain types only
- Index(es):