VPN through NAT?
- From: Troy Settle <troy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:21:25 -0400
Probably not the best list to ask this on, but it's the closest that I'm subscribed to...
I have several customers who use VPN (Windows PPTP) to connect to their Corporate networks. The first was sitting behind NAT on a FreeBSD router. The PPTP did not work. I moved them out of NAT and onto a regular IP, and it worked fine. I then swapped out the FreeBSD box with a Cisco 2620 and again tried the PPTP via NAT, but still it wouldn't work.
Another customer is behind a Cisco 804 and his PPTP also did not work when his network was behind NAT, so I have to assign a static subnet for him.
From home, sitting behind NAT on my Netgear router, I can turn up PPTP connections all day long. What gives with FreeBSD and Cisco's implementation of NAT that PPTP doesn't want to work?
Thanks,
--
--
Troy Settle
Pulaski Networks
http://www.psknet.com
866.477.5638
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VPN through NAT?
- From: Jeff at NorrisTechs
- Re: VPN through NAT?
- From: Jeff at NorrisTechs
- Re: VPN through NAT?
- From: Eric Anderson
- Re: VPN through NAT?
- Prev by Date: Re: Ports security [was: Ports/source dance]
- Next by Date: Re: VPN through NAT?
- Previous by thread: Ports/source dance
- Next by thread: Re: VPN through NAT?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|