Re: VPN through NAT?
- From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:30:17 +0100
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 06:28:33PM -0600, Jeff at NorrisTechs wrote:
I assume you have TCP port 1723 forwarding from the internet/dmz to the
PPTP host?. That should be enough for most PPTP based VPN clients.
It's can be difficult with IPSEC as you have to forward UDP 500,
Protocol 50 and Protocol 51 to / from the VPN client from your NAT router.
If the *clients* are behind NAT, when running IPSEC there should be nothing
to do.
IPSEC uses UDP 500 (outbound) to start the key exchange, detects NAT, and
then switches to UDP 4500 for IPSEC NAT traversal. It also sends NAT
keepalive packets every 20 seconds by default.
So if you have a NAT-aware IPSEC client, it should work with any old NAT
firewall without any config changes on that firewall, as long as it allows
outbound connections. It was designed to work in hotels etc.
Microsoft's L2TP over IPSEC works just fine for this (with Win2K you need to
install a NAT traversal patch). I've no idea about PPTP though. I don't use
it, as it's generally considered insecure compared with IPSEC.
I believe some routers have a "PPTP passthrough" mode, which you could try
turning on (or off) to see if it fixes the problem.
Regards,
Brian.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- VPN through NAT?
- From: Troy Settle
- Re: VPN through NAT?
- From: Jeff at NorrisTechs
- VPN through NAT?
- Prev by Date: Re: VPN through NAT?
- Next by Date: modem pool
- Previous by thread: Re: VPN through NAT?
- Next by thread: Re: VPN through NAT?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
