Re: VPN through NAT?
- From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:19:12 +0100
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 11:53:04AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
If you have multiple clients trying to use the VPN from behind NAT,
note that you can only have one VPN endpoint per externally routable
IP
This depends on the implementation of your IPSEC termination device.
The tests I've done are using L2TP over IPSEC transport mode as the VPN
access method.
The following termination devices work properly, even with multiple clients
behind the same NAT firewall, or multiple clients using the same local IP
address (e.g. 192.168.1.1) but behind different NAT firewalls.
* Cisco IOS (you need a recent version and "set nat demux")
* Juniper ERX310
However, the following do not:
* Juniper Netscreen
* Linux (l2tpd)
* FreeBSD (sl2tps)
There's no fundamental reason why it can't work - the firewall simply NATs
each stream to a different UDP source port. It's just that many IPSEC
implementations don't take NAT-T into account when looking up SPIs in their
SADB.
Regards,
Brian.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: VPN through NAT?
- From: Jeff Norris
- Re: VPN through NAT?
- From: Chuck Swiger
- Re: VPN through NAT?
- Prev by Date: Re: VPN through NAT?
- Next by Date: Re: Mail Delivery (failure galeriekrinzinger@chello.at)
- Previous by thread: Re: VPN through NAT?
- Next by thread: Re: VPN through NAT?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|