Re: How to optimize ruleset for gateway?
- From: Sergej Kandyla <_paix@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:13:51 +0200
Vladimir Kapustin wrote:
I don't think this is a good idea, and now I choosing some otherI think you should configure PF with PF-ALTQ
variants of optimization, such as:
1. Configure PF for major rules and SPAM filtering and IPFW+DUMMYNET for
queueing. I've read somewhere, that IPFW-shaper supports tables the way I
need. I'm afraid that two firewalls should significantly decrease perfomance.
Some PF resources :
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ http://www.benzedrine.cx/ackpri.html
Examples in /usr/share/examples/pf/ could be useful too.
2. Configure only IPFW. But this means that I have to read full documentation
about it, and find the way to protect the Internet from SPAM going from my local NET.
Could somebody give me some advice what way to go?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- How to optimize ruleset for gateway?
- From: Vladimir Kapustin
- How to optimize ruleset for gateway?
- Prev by Date: Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- Next by Date: Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- Previous by thread: How to optimize ruleset for gateway?
- Next by thread: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- Index(es):