Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- From: Francisco Reyes <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:48:57 -0500
Mike Tancsa writes:
Strange, our daemons dont grow that large. Are you using LDAP lookups or something like that compiled against it ? Looking at one box, running a dev version
Again this is my frustration with ClamAv.
Some versions behave great, but as we upgrade some versions had serious problems like growing over 512MB in memory usage.
and a version .90 started last Friday shows 74MB of mem usage.
Tried .90 shortly after the port was done and had nothing but problems.
Going to try it with the alternate threading library suggested earlier in the thread.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-isp@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- From: Mike Tancsa
- *****SPAM***** Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- Re: Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- Prev by Date: Re: Separating users so they do not see each others's directories in FreeBSD
- Next by Date: Re: ALTERNATIVE TO USE OF IP-ADDRESS ALIASES
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- Next by thread: Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|