RE: A problem with too many network interfaces
From: Don Bowman (don_at_sandvine.com)
Date: 05/27/03
- Previous message: Garrett Wollman: "Re: A problem with too many network interfaces"
- Maybe in reply to: Eric W.Bates: "A problem with too many network interfaces"
- Next in thread: Garrett Wollman: "RE: A problem with too many network interfaces"
- Reply: Garrett Wollman: "RE: A problem with too many network interfaces"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: 'Garrett Wollman' <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>, <mbsd@pacbell.net> Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 13:44:35 -0400
> From: Garrett Wollman [mailto:wollman@lcs.mit.edu]
> <<On Mon, 26 May 2003 14:04:19 -0700 (PDT),
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= <mbsd@pacbell.net> said:
>
> > A proper BSD port could use something like the trick in
> Stevens[1] and
> > keep retrying the call with a larger bufer until the length of the
> > result is the same as in the previous call.
>
> Actually, a proper BSD port would use the net.route.iflist sysctl
> instead.
>
> -GAWollman
$ uname -sr
FreeBSD 4.6-RC
$ sysctl net.route
sysctl: unknown oid 'net.route'
I think since the ports work against other than current branch
it would be difficult to support?
--don
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Garrett Wollman: "Re: A problem with too many network interfaces"
- Maybe in reply to: Eric W.Bates: "A problem with too many network interfaces"
- Next in thread: Garrett Wollman: "RE: A problem with too many network interfaces"
- Reply: Garrett Wollman: "RE: A problem with too many network interfaces"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]