gratuitous ARP with em interface.
akanwar_at_digitarchy.com
Date: 05/29/03
- Previous message: Barney Wolff: "Re: ipfw rules vs routes to localhost?"
- Next in thread: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: gratuitous ARP with em interface."
- Reply: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: gratuitous ARP with em interface."
- Maybe reply: mvsjetti_at_hss.hns.com: "RE: gratuitous ARP with em interface."
- Maybe reply: akanwar_at_digitarchy.com: "RE: gratuitous ARP with em interface."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 19:57:07 -0400
Hi all,
Is there a known issue with alias IPs on em interfaces not sending out
gratuitous arps ?
The situation is as follows:
I am running a custom redundancy daemon that migrates the IP address of a
server from one interface to another in case the active network path fails.
Till now I was experimenting with two fxp interfaces and everything worked
perfectly. i.e. when the ip address moved over (using a perl script to run
ifconfig commands) it sent out grat. arps for each of its alias IPs. This
allowed the router to update its Arp table and talk to the newly active
interface.
Now when I try running the code with em (gigabit Ethernet over copper)
NICs, I simply do not see the gratuitous arps come out of the new interface.
I am at a loss to understand what has changed. Could it be that the line
DOWN -> UP time of the em interface is longer thereby causing a loss of
ARPs ? Any suggestions ?
Thank you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Barney Wolff: "Re: ipfw rules vs routes to localhost?"
- Next in thread: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: gratuitous ARP with em interface."
- Reply: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: gratuitous ARP with em interface."
- Maybe reply: mvsjetti_at_hss.hns.com: "RE: gratuitous ARP with em interface."
- Maybe reply: akanwar_at_digitarchy.com: "RE: gratuitous ARP with em interface."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|