RE: gratuitous ARP with em interface.

From: Sreekanth (sreekanth_at_redlinenetworks.com)
Date: 05/30/03

  • Next message: Neelkanth Natu: "Re: ipfw rules vs routes to localhost?"
    To: <akanwar@digitarchy.com>, <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
    Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 17:49:11 -0700
    
    

    I did a quick test just now and...
    Interestingly I did see GARP packets on the network with Em copper
    connected to a 100base Switch(I don't have a gigabit Copper switch
    rightnow).
    You might want to try these things.
    1) Ping immediately after the link comes up and see if it succeeds.(In
    1000baseTX switch).
    2) Connect it to a 100Base port and try.
    3) Connect to another machine with crossover cable and try

    First try 1 and if it fails try 2 and 3.

    Hope it helps.

    Sreekanth

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org
    > [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of
    > akanwar@digitarchy.com
    > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 4:54 PM
    > To: sreekanth@redlinenetworks.com; mvsjetti@hss.hns.com;
    > pete@he.iki.fi; ru@freebsd.org;
    > freebsdnic@mailbox.cps.intel.com; freebsd-net@freebsd.org;
    > akanwar@digitarchy.com
    > Subject: RE: gratuitous ARP with em interface.
    >
    >
    > Thanks all for you replies.
    >
    > > I haven't tried this, but I think the problem would go away if you
    > > changed WAIT_FOR_AUTO_NEG_DEFAULT to 0 in "if_em.h".
    >
    > Changed this. Did not work.
    >
    > > If u can do kernel debugging put break point at the
    > > "arp_ifinit" and verify if this was getting called or
    > > not.................. cheers, mahesh
    >
    > Will try this.
    >
    > > Could be attributed to the spanning tree in the switch.I have
    > > seen it happening(especially with cisco switches).I bet you
    > > are not able to send out any packet(Not just Garp).
    >
    > No. Spanning tree is turned off (Tried it with both IOS and
    > Catalyst switches).
    >
    > > I haven't looked that deep into why, but em is quite slow
    > > on coming up compared to fxp for example. Probably
    > something to do with
    > > hardware re-initialization.
    >
    > Correct, there is a delay. "ifconfig em0 inet x.x.x.x/y"
    > takes a few seconds to complete whereas "ifconfig fxp0 inet
    > x.x.x.x/y" returns instantly.
    >
    >
    > Is there a way to force gratituous arp ? ( Short of writing a
    > raw socket
    > utility)
    >
    > Thanks,
    > -ansh
    >
    > > > >On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:57:07PM -0400,
    > > > akanwar@digitarchy.com wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >>Hi all,
    > > > >>
    > > > >>Is there a known issue with alias IPs on em interfaces not
    > > > sending out
    > > > >>gratuitous arps ?
    > > > >>
    > > > >>The situation is as follows:
    > > > >> I am running a custom redundancy daemon that migrates the
    > > > IP address
    > > > >>of a server from one interface to another in case the
    > > > active network
    > > > >>path fails. Till now I was experimenting with two fxp
    > > > interfaces and
    > > > >>everything worked perfectly. i.e. when the ip address moved over
    > > > >>(using a perl script to run ifconfig commands) it sent out
    > > > grat. arps
    > > > >>for each of its alias IPs. This allowed the router to
    > > > update its Arp
    > > > >>table and talk to the newly active interface.
    > > > >>
    > > > >>Now when I try running the code with em (gigabit Ethernet
    > > > over copper)
    > > > >>NICs, I simply do not see the gratuitous arps come out
    > of the new
    > > > >>interface.
    > > > >>
    > > > >>I am at a loss to understand what has changed. Could it
    > > be that the
    > > > >>line DOWN -> UP time of the em interface is longer thereby
    > > > causing a
    > > > >>loss of ARPs ? Any suggestions ?
    > > > >>
    > > > >>
    > > > >>
    > > > >Yes, I can reproduce this too, no gratuitous ARP is sent.
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >Cheers,
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > _______________________________________________
    > > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free> bsd-net To
    > > > unsubscribe, send any mail to
    > > > "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    > > >
    > > > ---
    > > > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
    > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    > > > Version: 6.0.483 / Virus Database: 279 - Release Date: 5/19/2003
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > > _______________________________________________
    > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free> bsd-net
    > > To
    > > unsubscribe, send any mail to
    > > "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    > >
    > >
    > > ---
    > > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
    > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    > > Version: 6.0.483 / Virus Database: 279 - Release Date: 5/19/2003
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > --------------------------------------------------------------------
    > mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free> bsd-net
    > To
    > unsubscribe, send any mail to
    > "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    >
    > ---
    > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
    > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    > Version: 6.0.483 / Virus Database: 279 - Release Date: 5/19/2003
    >
    >

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Neelkanth Natu: "Re: ipfw rules vs routes to localhost?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: monel screws
      ... The control for the trim tabs was a joystick type switch that applied power to the hydraulic motor and valves to the tabs. ... Power was applied in the switch through a set of contacts and a copper washer. ... He had been having problems with the system, taken the switch apart and decided to replace the copper washer because it was pitted from making and breaking the electrical contacts over many years of use. ...
      (rec.boats)
    • Re: 21CN
      ... will BT have to ensure xDSL to the house? ... house was DSL enabled. ... 21CN will start at the switch. ... Yes, copper does still figure. ...
      (uk.telecom.broadband)
    • Re: Dell switch
      ... Copper is fine for the small setup. ... Nick ... "Eddie Allen" wrote: ... >> I am looking at purchasing the Dell powerconnect 3324 switch. ...
      (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz2000)
    • Re: Verizon FIOS a new failure....
      ... They are bringing their culture of incompetence from copper to fiber. ... Personally I may switch to Fios for access/TV but I ...
      (alt.home.repair)
    • Re: gigabit nic
      ... 10/100/100 copper. ... Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ...
      (Debian-User)