Re: Collision on NIC
From: Matthew D. Fuller (fullermd_at_over-yonder.net)
Date: 05/31/03
- Previous message: Marko Zec: "Re: Network stack cloning / virtualization patches"
- In reply to: Erwane Breton: "Re: Collision on NIC"
- Next in thread: Wes Peters: "Re: Collision on NIC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 17:15:59 -0500 To: Erwane Breton <breton@erwane.net>
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 06:26:56PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Erwane Breton, and lo! it spake thus:
> > >
> > > Well, I don't see the problem.
> > >
> > > My math says that that's .03% collision rate, which is so deep in the
> > > noise as to be practically zero. What do you _think_ it should be?
> > >
> > Even Mr. Inventor of the ethernet himself regrets calling them collisions because
> > that term has a bad ring people unfamiliar with the technological detail.
> >
> > Pete
>
> So there are no answers or solutions ?
Solution: Do nothing, because nothing is /wrong/. There's nothing to
FIX. Move along, nothing to see here.
-- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet" _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Marko Zec: "Re: Network stack cloning / virtualization patches"
- In reply to: Erwane Breton: "Re: Collision on NIC"
- Next in thread: Wes Peters: "Re: Collision on NIC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
