Re: Port mapping services
From: Brett Glass (brett_at_lariat.org)
Date: 08/06/03
- Previous message: Brett Glass: "Port mapping services"
- Maybe in reply to: Brett Glass: "Port mapping services"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 10:34:09 -0600 To: alex@pilosoft.com
Are the two actually the same protocol? Or is Microsoft's
a case of "embrace and extend?" Why do they use different
port numbers? (The idea of having multiple port numbers
for port mapping seems to defeat the very purpose of having
a mapping service in the first place.)
Also, I'm looking for examples of firewalls that monitor
traffic to and from an RPC server to determine what traffic
to allow through. (They obviously have to do this, since one
can't rely on "well known" ports.)
--Brett Glass
At 09:05 AM 8/6/2003, alex@pilosoft.com wrote:
>111 is Sun-RPC
>135 is MS-RPC
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Brett Glass: "Port mapping services"
- Maybe in reply to: Brett Glass: "Port mapping services"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|