RE: Gif IPTunnel networkA-to-networkB not work
From: Oldach, Helge (Helge.Oldach_at_atosorigin.com)
Date: 08/27/03
- Previous message: Daniel C. Sobral: "Re: subnetting C class into /26 /25 /26, why can this be done?"
- Maybe in reply to: hilman firmansyah: "Gif IPTunnel networkA-to-networkB not work"
- Next in thread: hilman firmansyah: "Re: Gif IPTunnel networkA-to-networkB not work"
- Reply: hilman firmansyah: "Re: Gif IPTunnel networkA-to-networkB not work"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "'Lars Eggert'" <larse@ISI.EDU> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:56:05 +0200
> From: Lars Eggert [mailto:larse@ISI.EDU]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 17:45
> To: Oldach, Helge
> Cc: hilman firmansyah; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Gif IPTunnel networkA-to-networkB not work
> Oldach, Helge wrote:
> > You must have the networks connected (on the public side), but when
> > using IPSec your gif tunnel won't really be used. It is just sort of
> > a "placeholder" to get the routing correct.
>
> It is not a good idea to use gifs in parallel with IPsec tunnel mode.,
> to do this routing trick.
Fully agreed. The point is that a lot of documents on the web advise
to set up a gif tunnel in order to set up a IPSec tunnel. Which
is essentially nonsense. Apparently the original poster fell into the
same trap. Hence my clarification.
Helge
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Daniel C. Sobral: "Re: subnetting C class into /26 /25 /26, why can this be done?"
- Maybe in reply to: hilman firmansyah: "Gif IPTunnel networkA-to-networkB not work"
- Next in thread: hilman firmansyah: "Re: Gif IPTunnel networkA-to-networkB not work"
- Reply: hilman firmansyah: "Re: Gif IPTunnel networkA-to-networkB not work"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|