Re: iMac and FreeBSD performance problems

From: Bill Vermillion (bv_at_wjv.com)
Date: 10/31/03

  • Next message: Crist J. Clark: "Re: (long) Re: Using racoon-negotiated IPSec with ipfw and natd"
    Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:27:54 -0500
    To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
    
    

    Even though on Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 01:01 Keith Mitchell
     realized that everything he says should be taken cum grano salis, he
     unhesitatingly continued with this missive:

    > I'm trying to figure out why my FreeBSD box and my iMac are having
    > trouble communicating at 100 Mbs full-duplex.

    > To briefly describe my LAN setup, I have a 16port linksys
    > 10/100 ethernet switch connected to two FreeBSD systems, an
    > iMac, a PC and some other miscellaneous stuff. Everything works
    > fine except the interaction between the iMac and the FreeBSD
    > machines.

    > What I see is extremely slow transfers (FTP/TFTP at least) from
    > the FreeBSD machines to the iMac. The reverse direction (from
    > the iMac to the FreeBSD machiens work fine). If this isn't bad
    > enough, if I connect the iMac to a 10BT hub instead of the
    > ethernet switch then everything seems to work fine as well.
    > The iMac can talk to all the other equipment without a problem
    > when its connected to the ethernet switch. Likewise the FreeBSD
    > machines can talk to each other without any problems and to all
    > of the other networking equipment.... they just can't talk to
    > the iMac efficiently.

    I've seen this as a client has 2 G4s and an xrack in our rack
    space. All machines go through a Cisco 2948, that goes through a
    bride on an Etinc BWManager, to a 7120, then to the facility
    gigabit switch.

    Transfers between any of the Apple machines are blazingly fast.
    >From the FBSD machines in the rack to anywhere else speed is fast.
    But between the BSD and the Apples speed drops to the 10KB ranage
    at times.

    >From the outside world the transfers from the BSD machines are
    limited only by connectivity and I got 6Mb/sec transfers from some
    SW at AT&T to the local machines recently - as we are on a Level 3
    backbone and it's fast.

    I've also heard via a 3rd party that a person we are associated
    with at Omneon Video Technologies [omneon.com] that they had the
    problem there. They reportedly got a patch from Apple on this, but
    this appears to be something which is not distributed.

    Last week I was at an SACD listening party given by an engineer
    friend of mine and they were all engineers, musicians, producers,
    etc., and all used Macs and ProTools. A well known CD mastering
    engineer asked me if I knew why is Mac to XP transfers were so
    slow.

    So this a problem - not widespread - and not occuring everywhere.
    It's just some machines at some times.

    Just throwing this out as it appears not be isolated but not a big
    enough problem that Apple addressed in a general patch/fix - IF
    what I was told that what Omneon experienced is true.

    > Anyone have any clues on this bizarre problem?

    No.

    But I'm going to see if I can trace down what I have heard, that
    may only be rumors.

    Bill

    -- 
    Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Crist J. Clark: "Re: (long) Re: Using racoon-negotiated IPSec with ipfw and natd"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: iMac repair the economical way!
      ... > If Apple had only put in an adequate ... control have Panasonic/Matsushita fans in place. ... I've never seen an iMac putting out more than moderately warm air...even ... not help those machines along a little with their cooling needs. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
    • Re: Quad G5 Goes Down...
      ... (2.5GHz Quad G5) ... Apple would provide some kind of preemptive care (check/replace your ... machines from my SE30 on have always lasted longer than my PCs. ... have a>2 yr old iMac G5 at home that has been very good. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
    • Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
      ... I have over 800 nodes installed in the field with FreeBSD 6.0 running ... as routers on silly little 1.3Ghz machines with 256MB of RAM. ... regardless of the fact the hardware is fast. ... > support a lot of newer harder. ...
      (freebsd-performance)
    • Re: More on caching and logging
      ... Please point to a citation of where, exactly, Apple said any such thing. ... those who do care have machines which can run Classic and as ... I suspect that Leopard _will_ support Classic, ... Kiddo, the first Mac I bought had no fans, a nine-inch 542x320 pixel ...
      (comp.sys.mac.system)
    • Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
      ... And everyone on the FreeBSD team knows ... > the day because the machines NEVER die. ... These boxes build 200+ page 300dpi PDF ... >>> support a lot of newer harder. ...
      (freebsd-performance)