Re: IPSec VPN & NATD (problem with alias_address vs redirect_addr ess)

From: Kurt Jaeger (lists_at_complx.LF.net)
Date: 11/16/03

  • Next message: Vladimir B. Grebenschikov: "Re: Static route via address, not interface" 
    Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:37:20 +0100
To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org

    Hi!

    > FreeBSD lacks features deployed in the market, when acting as a VPN
    > endpoint, as well as when acting as a NAT device in the VPN packet flow.
    > Either is a pity, unfortunately.
    >
    > I am not complaining; I am just stating that we're behind. But FreeS/WAN
    > is in no better shape.

    Who would be willing/capable to add this to the code, if someone else
    (maybe LF.net?) would pay for the expense ? 

    -- 
MfG/Best regards, Kurt Jaeger                                  17 years to go !
LF.net GmbH        fon +49 711 90074-23  pi@LF.net  
Ruppmannstr. 27    fax +49 711 90074-33
D-70565 Stuttgart  mob +49 171 3101372
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Vladimir B. Grebenschikov: "Re: Static route via address, not interface"

    Relevant Pages