Re: FreeBSD 4.9 / VRRP / vlan
From: Spyou (root_at_spyou.org)
Date: 11/27/03
- Previous message: Pawel Malachowski: "Re: FreeBSD 4.9 / VRRP / vlan"
- In reply to: Pawel Malachowski: "Re: FreeBSD 4.9 / VRRP / vlan"
- Next in thread: Pawel Malachowski: "Re: FreeBSD 4.9 / VRRP / vlan"
- Reply: Pawel Malachowski: "Re: FreeBSD 4.9 / VRRP / vlan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:56:58 +0100 To: Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl>
At 22:54 27/11/2003, Pawel Malachowski wrote:
>When moving IP address from R1 to R2, R2 is not able to bring this IP
>up cause it already has route to that network in routing table. Is it
>possible You have similar problem here?
I had this problem a few days ago ...
I've found a solution that is not very clean but that works :
ether cards have static IP from the subnet (ie 62.233.44.252/24 and
62.233.44.253/24) and the virtual IP is declared as /32 in freevrrpd (ie
62.233.44.254/32)
There's no problem to add the virtual IP as an alias of ether cards ..
The problem with OSPF was solved with a perl script that told OSPF's
passive router not to announce the subnet to others one
This solution (w/o vlans) works .. the downtime is something like 3/4
seconds .. wich is acceptable for my applications :)
but i can't work w/o vlans :(
>--
>Paweł Małachowski
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Pawel Malachowski: "Re: FreeBSD 4.9 / VRRP / vlan"
- In reply to: Pawel Malachowski: "Re: FreeBSD 4.9 / VRRP / vlan"
- Next in thread: Pawel Malachowski: "Re: FreeBSD 4.9 / VRRP / vlan"
- Reply: Pawel Malachowski: "Re: FreeBSD 4.9 / VRRP / vlan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|