Newbie question: is net.inet.ip.fastforwarding intended for routers only?
From: Xin LI (delphij_at_frontfree.net)
Date: 01/17/04
- Previous message: Kelly Yancey: "Re: bge data corruption bug (was: 1168 octets payload and bad TCPchecksums)"
- Next in thread: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: Newbie question: is net.inet.ip.fastforwarding intended for routers only?"
- Reply: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: Newbie question: is net.inet.ip.fastforwarding intended for routers only?"
- Reply: Andre Oppermann: "Re: Newbie question: is net.inet.ip.fastforwarding intended for routersonly?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 12:17:48 +0800
As title. To my imagination (I have taken a sight on the kernel networking
code), the fastforwarding path is intended for routers only, so if I want
some functionalities, for example, NAT, the fastforwarding is not useful,
and my experiment shows that if I enable it, ipfilter's NAT will be broken.
Am I right?
Thanks in advance!
Xin LI
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Kelly Yancey: "Re: bge data corruption bug (was: 1168 octets payload and bad TCPchecksums)"
- Next in thread: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: Newbie question: is net.inet.ip.fastforwarding intended for routers only?"
- Reply: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: Newbie question: is net.inet.ip.fastforwarding intended for routers only?"
- Reply: Andre Oppermann: "Re: Newbie question: is net.inet.ip.fastforwarding intended for routersonly?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]