Re: tcp mss MCLBYTES restriction
From: Andrew Gallatin (gallatin_at_cs.duke.edu)
Date: 01/20/04
- Previous message: Andre Oppermann: "Re: tcp mss MCLBYTES restriction"
- In reply to: Andre Oppermann: "Re: tcp mss MCLBYTES restriction"
- Next in thread: David Borman: "Re: tcp mss MCLBYTES restriction"
- Reply: David Borman: "Re: tcp mss MCLBYTES restriction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:52:27 -0500 (EST) To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Andre Oppermann writes:
> When I was implementing the tcp_hostcache I reorganized/redid the
> tcp_mss() function and wondered about that too. I don't know if
> this rounding to MCLBYTES is still the right thing to do.
I have the feeling its something from ancient days on vaxes. ;)
> > Would it be OK if I made this code optional via a sysctl?
>
> Could you run some bechmarks with the current MCLBYTES rounding
> and without it on 100Mbit 1.5kMTU and GigE with 9k MTU?
1.5k MTU won't matter -- it doesn't hit the rounding case anyway.
But I can certainly run some tests with 9k.
Drew
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Andre Oppermann: "Re: tcp mss MCLBYTES restriction"
- In reply to: Andre Oppermann: "Re: tcp mss MCLBYTES restriction"
- Next in thread: David Borman: "Re: tcp mss MCLBYTES restriction"
- Reply: David Borman: "Re: tcp mss MCLBYTES restriction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|