Re: Large scale NAT - problem resolved

From: Julian Elischer (julian_at_elischer.org)
Date: 01/28/04

  • Next message: Eli Dart: "Re: Large scale NAT - problem resolved"
    Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:06:06 -0800 (PST)
    To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
    
    

    On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:

    > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:46:03PM +0200, veedee@c7.campus.utcluj.ro wrote:
    > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:41:20PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
    > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:15:56AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Andriy Korud wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Hi,
    > > > > > At last I've managed to build stable NAT on FreeBSD box for 34Mbit link and
    > > > > > ~2000 clients (cable modem network).
    > > > > > At full speed (34Mbit) CPU usage is 0% and system load is 0.0 :-)
    > > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > It'd be really interesting to see how natd would handle such a load....
    > > > >
    > > > You must be kidding. ;)
    > >
    > > Agreed. NATd "crashes" with 400 clients on AMD Athlon 900Mhz. :( ipnat
    > > works fine.
    > >
    > > This raises a question... is there any point in still having natd? (don't
    > > throw rocks at me please, I'm just asking). Or maybe it's still being used
    > > for servers with less clients to nat?
    > >
    > If your Internet connection is 128kbit/s, it can cope with it nicely.
    > One day I will write the ng_nat(4) module.

    actually it can cope with a LOT more than that.. We see no degredation
    nating a 100Mb link.. (though not fully).

    >
    >
    > Cheers,
    > --
    > Ruslan Ermilov
    > FreeBSD committer
    > ru@FreeBSD.org
    >

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Eli Dart: "Re: Large scale NAT - problem resolved"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [PATCH] mount(8) broken
      ... In message, Ruslan Ermilov writes: ... They should hopefully be able to cope due to the fact that MNT_NODEV ... Poul-Henning Kamp ... Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: FreeBSD and "make -j# buildworld" usability
      ... On Oct 13, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: ... My buildkernel fails since I compile acpi static. ... *** Error code 2 ... FreeBSD committer ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: 4.8p16 buildworld fails with NO_OPENSSL
      ... You can pull up that revision manually, as these fixes won't go into ... security branches. ... Ruslan Ermilov ... FreeBSD committer ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: nanobsd and -current
      ... anyone has this alreay all written down somewhere ... please see the src.confmanpage for details. ... Ruslan Ermilov ... FreeBSD committer ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: nanobsd and -current
      ... please see the src.confmanpage for details. ... src.confis only in HEAD though. ... Ruslan Ermilov ... FreeBSD committer ...
      (freebsd-current)