NAS-Port
From: Anton Blajev (valqk_at_lozenetz.net)
Date: 02/20/04
- Previous message: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: Request For Some help On Netgraph"
- Next in thread: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: NAS-Port"
- Reply: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: NAS-Port"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:11:43 +0200
Hello there,
It's me again :)
I'm writing with an idea,
As we saw NAS-Port is not obligatory, it's used to say about the port
client's using to connect, okay...
but why ins't ppp sending
NAS-Port = tun0 for example (with the other type value:
something like this:
NAS-Port-Type = "Virtual"
NAS-Port = "tun0"
)
Wouldn't this be good to be done , because freeradius (and myabe other
radiuses) are using NAS-Port for unique identifyer to give an ip
addres... so there are no duplicates...
So, I'm asking... wouldn't be more proper and accurate ppp to send
NAS-Port = tun or it's being done on purpose not to do this.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: Request For Some help On Netgraph"
- Next in thread: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: NAS-Port"
- Reply: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: NAS-Port"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]