Re: different traffic accounting trafd vs. ipcad
From: Gleb Smirnoff (glebius_at_cell.sick.ru)
Date: 02/24/04
- Previous message: veedee_at_c7.campus.utcluj.ro: "Re: different traffic accounting trafd vs. ipcad"
- In reply to: veedee_at_c7.campus.utcluj.ro: "Re: different traffic accounting trafd vs. ipcad"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:11:20 +0300 To: veedee@c7.campus.utcluj.ro
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:59:24PM +0200, veedee@c7.campus.utcluj.ro wrote:
v> > trafd itself is very buggy. I'd better do not trust
v> > its data. Use ipcad, ipacct or ng_ipacct. trafd'd bugginess was discussed a
v> > lot in different russian-speaking mailinglists.
v>
v> Can you please be more specific? What do you mean by buggy? I haven't
v> seen anything about that on the WWW, but then again, I do not speak russian
v> :(
Look at ports/net/trafd/files/patch-ah. This will make your
opinion about code quality :)
-- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: veedee_at_c7.campus.utcluj.ro: "Re: different traffic accounting trafd vs. ipcad"
- In reply to: veedee_at_c7.campus.utcluj.ro: "Re: different traffic accounting trafd vs. ipcad"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|