Re: Byte counters reset at ~4GB
From: Mike Jakubik (mikej_at_rogers.com)
Date: 03/16/04
- Previous message: Max Laier: "Re: Byte counters reset at ~4GB"
- In reply to: Max Laier: "Re: Byte counters reset at ~4GB"
- Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: Byte counters reset at ~4GB"
- Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: Byte counters reset at ~4GB"
- Reply: John Polstra: "Re: Byte counters reset at ~4GB"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:48:21 -0500 (EST) To: "Max Laier" <max@love2party.net>
Max Laier said:
> Sure, you measure it ;) ... no, of course it is more expensive to update a
> 64bit counter on a 32bit arch, but the key (once again) is descision:
> While
> (almost) all of the pf counters are 64bit types you can configure it not
> to
> use the loginterface or whatsoever more. So it's up to you: You need 64bit
> counters? You shall have them! You need *fast* 64bit counters? AMD sells
> nice processors (they say)! ... you get the idea.
Got it. In just curious though... realistically, how big of an impact on
performance is this on a modern CPU? Is it not simply the original 32bit
calculation x 2?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Max Laier: "Re: Byte counters reset at ~4GB"
- In reply to: Max Laier: "Re: Byte counters reset at ~4GB"
- Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: Byte counters reset at ~4GB"
- Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: Byte counters reset at ~4GB"
- Reply: John Polstra: "Re: Byte counters reset at ~4GB"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]