Re: IPSec troubles

From: Bjoern A. Zeeb (bzeeb-lists_at_lists.zabbadoz.net)
Date: 03/30/04

  • Next message: Hajimu UMEMOTO: "Re: IPSec troubles"
    Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:33:08 +0000 (UTC)
    To: Cyrill Rüttimann <ruettimac@mac.com>
    
    

    On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Cyrill Rüttimann wrote:

    Hi,

    > > If this is the remaining problem apart from the yet known (where KAME
    > > people cannot find the time to review at the moment) I may look into
    > > this; have setup my wireless connection on a 5.2.1 notebook (being
    > > updated to HEAD soon) to use IPSec lately so I have a 'testbed' now.
    >
    > Please can you report if IPSec is working with current or the latest
    > stable?
    >
    > With 5.2.1, you are lost completely. IPSec with kernel options do not
    > work and if you enable FAST_IPSEC (which should work), you end up not
    > able to compile the kernel. There was a patch mentioned to solve this,
    > but for me it did not work.

    I have been able to use IPSEC (do not know about FAST_IPSEC) with
    5.2.1R miniinst installation on following setup:

    notebook(wi0) <---> AP(bridge) <----> (fxp2)router

    I am now on a 5.2.1R with a private kernel incooperated some of my
    IPSEC related patches from HEAD (not all) and it also works.

    What I had to do had been "excluding IKE traffic" by doing s.th.
     like this (router side config):

    spdadd ROUTER[500] NOTEBOOK[500] udp
            -P out none ;

    spdadd NOTEBOOK[500] ROUTER[500] udp
            -P in none ;

    This for sure is not the most nifty way to do but it works.

    -- 
    Greetings
    Bjoern A. Zeeb				bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
    56 69 73 69 74				http://www.zabbadoz.net/
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Hajimu UMEMOTO: "Re: IPSec troubles"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Attacks on IPsec
      ... > group disown what is only now starting to be deployed. ... (which in turn implies replacing everybody's kernel). ... advantage over end-to-end ipsec ... ... communicating for the first time with a complete stranger (aka the ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Debugging with memguard...
      ... I'm trying to track down a memory issue with IPsec in CURRENT. ... PS Kernel Config attached but it's not very interesting I think. ... # Power management support ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Potential IPSec DoS/Kernel Panic with 2.6.13
      ... I've found what I believe is a potential DoS condition in IPSec using Debian ... Custom Linux kernel 2.6.13 ... This oversize ping packet seems to repeatedly crash the ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • NAT + IPsec in 2.6.0-test2
      ... 2.6.0-test2-mm1 kernel on my home Internet gateway system. ... Basically the IPsec tunnel had only a single IP address on the remote ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: A radical restructuring of IPsec...
      ... The IPSEC kernel option is removed, ... This is a test patch and has a known problem with routing packets through a node. ... KAME IPSEC is one of those components, so if you compile KAME IPSEC into your kernel, you see a significant performance loss. ...
      (freebsd-net)