RE: Looking for switch recommendations ...
From: Chance Whaley (chance_at_dreamscope.com)
Date: 03/31/04
- Previous message: Crist J. Clark: "Re: IPSec troubles"
- In reply to: Wes Peters: "Re: Looking for switch recommendations ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "'Wes Peters'" <wes@softweyr.com>, "'Steven Stremciuc'" <steve@freeslacker.net>, <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 01:32:02 -0700
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Wes Peters
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 3:06 PM
> To: Steven Stremciuc; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Looking for switch recommendations ...
>
>
> Every switch that does port mirroring probably has some
> problems related to port mirroring, because mirroring
> typically cannot be done in hardware. If nothing else, you
> can expect some degraded performance on the port(s) being
> mirrored and on the port doing the mirroring, because the
> packets have to be fondled by the CPU before they can be
> switched. Even with a really fast processor, this will
> increase the latency a bit.
This is an untrue statement. There are several switch vendors that pride
themselves on their wire-speed mirroring capabilities - specifically their
ability to do it in hardware. Foundry's BigIron and the like comes to mind
as a highly reliable and fairly inexpensive (subjective) switch that is very
capable of doing multi-port wirespeed mirroring at line rate.
.chance
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Crist J. Clark: "Re: IPSec troubles"
- In reply to: Wes Peters: "Re: Looking for switch recommendations ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|